Who else doesnt mind a Souls game every year?

[Ruler]

Wright said:

Ruler said:

- yes it does matter, if the side content exceeds the main content. Content is still content.

- the technical issues werent that bad like you make it up to be. You didnt even played and beat the game when there was no patch at all so why are you complaining?

- Bloodborne has a good chalice dungeon system, and no the rooms arent just swapped in the route chalice dungeons. Maybe some of the rooms are used as blue prints but every room can contain different enemies, items and objects in it, and there are a lot of completley different rooms not used in the normal chalice dungeons etc. The Chalice dungeons could have been improved in the newer games, but now they arent even included in Dark Souls 3 because people complained way too unconstructive. I rather have the chalice dungeons than not having them at all, and they clearly removed them and didnt increase the main campaign in DS3 the numbers show.

With all this being said, Bloodbornes Chalice Dungeons are light years ahead in Design and Quality to Diablo 3s maps or any game generating its own maps

- DS3 isnt longer than Bloodborne

 

- It's not about the side content exceeding the main content. It's about BOTH the side and main content exceeding themselves, which Bloodborne falters on the later. And that's merely the product of From not having enough time, simple as that.

- So what if I played it later? With my potato-quality internet connection I skipped the download process of the patch and went directly to play the game while it downloaded on the background. I'm sorry but I endured the same problems everyone who played the vanilla did, although I didn't beat the whole game with those issues on my side.

- It's clear we'll never agree about the Chalice Dungeons, so I suggest just leaving it here. I don't discuss how good the idea sound on paper, I merely point out how unamusing they ended up being.

- DS3's main campaing is longer than Bloodborne's main campaign. The problem here is that From did the actual opposite of what they did with Bloodborne: Dark Souls 3 has a lenghty main campaing, but small side content. Bloodborne has a small main campaign, but lenghty side content. Both are the result of having such small time to develop.

 

EDIT:

Bloodborne and Dark Souls 3 are like very short if we compare them both to Demon's, Dark or Dark Souls 2.

come on wright even the Strategy Guides agree with me