| green_sky said: Hey guys. Saw this and i'd want to see your thoughts on it.
*benches*
Basically how Nvidia gpu's age much worse than AMD ones. It could be that Nvidia has better drivers initially but over time things change and AMD provides more longevity. I currently have Nvidia card but will switch to AMD next time if they only want to cater to high end buyers who upgrade every year or two. Source: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1220928 |
Being positive, it's what you say, Nvidia has better drivers out of the gate and AMD has to catch up with them over time. But even then, that doesn't explain why the Kepler cards (GTX 7xx cards) lost 13, 20 and 30% respectively.
Also, those numbers prove that AMD made a good decision when they moved to the GCN design.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
