Veknoid_Outcast on 18 May 2016
| AEGRO said: I never said that. All i said is that i found hilarious how there are still some people that believe that Metacritic is irrelevant, when it is obviously not. So in other words, you and i agree with the idea of a very relevant page, yet flawed. Antoher clear example of Metacritic relevancy: [snip] |
I believe those who question the relevance of Metacritic do so in the context of its critical legitimacy, not in the context of its effects on the industry. There's no denying Metacritic is important for advertisers, publishers, and developers. Whether or not the site points at any kind of objective truth or whether it's a useful tool to measure quality is up for debate.
