Universal oversight? Absolutely not. That's opening the door for far more serious problems. Metacritic can be more picky but otherwise oversight of published works should fall only on the publishers. If people would follow through on their "never reading x again or visiting y site again" threats than the market would sort this out. If the publisher publishes crap, don't visit their site of buy their magazine. But if a review is intellectually put together and still gives the game a weak score it should not be censored because it is different from the norm. The fact people ASK for universal oversight and CENSORSHIP OF DISSENTING OPINIONS while simultaneously whining like broken motors over six inches of tits being covered in a final or localized version of a game is mind blowing.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
