Who else doesnt mind a Souls game every year?

[sc94597]

Ruler said:

sc94597 said:

Sure I don't have to, but like I said: I'd rather they put more time and effort into development and innovations than to fall into the Pokemon trap of incremental changes. And if a lot of people are like me, the sales can slouch. Look at Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty - both much bigger series than Souls that have slowed down a bit due to yearly releases. You might be alright with a yearly Dark Souls game now, but if it means the series stagnates (like these series had) then your tune might change.

I will also like to add that I don't consider Bloodborne and Demon's Souls to be a problem if they come between Dark Souls releases in a yearly fashion. They are different enough from Dark Souls to merit a separate release schedule.

you compare souls to games who have almost zero level and gameplay design. Even Dark Souls 2 was better than anything those games ever came up with 

These games were acclaimed when they first went mainstream as well. Call of Duty 4 had a 94% metacritic and Assassin's Creed II a 91%. Syndicate had a 76% Metacritic and Advanced Warfare an 83%.  Just because you might've not liked them doesn't mean that others didn't. I personally really enjoyed the CoD series from CoD2 through CoD4. After that it got stale and gimmicky. The same was true for Assassin's Creed until it peaked with IV.