By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24633115/

Very ballsy of MS to allow this to be published online! Realistically, though: they didn't know it was going up, until after it did. Totally.

Quote:

By Kristin Kalning
Games editor
MSNBC

 
By now, you’ve probably heard that "Grand Theft Auto IV" made a ton of money in its first week, besting "Iron Man’s" box office take for the same period.

Do a quick scan of Metacritic, a Web site that averages professional reviews for entertainment media, and you’ll see that "GTA IV" earns a near perfect score. Many sites, such as GameSpot, IGN, 1UP.com, the Edge – all gave the game 100 percent. That’s gotta juice a game’s sales, right?

I’m about four hours into the game, and I’m bored. The city is awesome — no doubt about it. But I’m impatient for things to get going. I’m tired of bowling, watching TV and waiting for people to call me.

I know, I know. Apparently, I need to devote a good 10 hours to "GTA IV" before I start to "get it." My Xbox 360 got the dreaded Red Ring of Death hardware failure over the weekend, so that’s stopped my progress for now. (Msnbc.com is a joint Microsoft - NBC Universal venture.)

But still, shouldn’t the magic of a "perfect" game be apparent to me after four hours?

 

/End quote

 

Seriously, to me, the fun little fiction of game review scores has been shattered by GTAIV's ridiculous and suspicious reviews. I'm back to the good old days of wanting to play a game for a while to see if I like it, rather than caring about review scores any more. About the only thing I want to see from reviews now are reports of bugs and things that wouldnt' be apparent to me from seeing or playing the game for a short time. Scores are deader than Reagan.