By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

For consumers I think it would have been best to wait one year doing more R&D to have rock solid hardware and have a built-in Blu-Ray drive (cross platform devs would have more space to work with, would be pushed to optimise for predictable constant streaming and disc scratching complaints would be non-existant). From a technology standpoint IMO no HD DVD, from a market standpoint a prolonged format war wouldn't have been beneficial.

Microsoft would still have an advantage with regard to legacy game engine porting the first one or two years. A 20 GB harddrive should have been minimal by default for devs to cache onto, Live should IMO have been free. If any company can easily afford this it would be Microsoft.

I don't think they would have done much worse in terms of sales. A Blu-Ray drive would be more expensive but RRoD is expensive as well.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales