And some of you thought that they wouldn't be faster than a 980Ti... Ha!
Those are some beasty cards, even more than I thought (35-40%).
*Edit*
Here's a quick comparison table:
GTX 1080 | GTX 1070 | GTX 980 Ti | GTX 980 | |
CUDA Cores | 2560 | 2048? | 2816 | 2048 |
Texture Units | 160? | ? | 176 | 128 |
ROPs | 64 | ? | 96 | 64 |
Core Clock | 1607MHz | ? | 1000MHz | 1126MHz |
Boost Clock | 1733MHz | ? | 1075MHz | 1216MHz |
Memory Clock | 10GHz GDDR5X | 8GHz GDDR5? | 7GHz GDDR5 | 7GHz GDDR5 |
Memory Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit? | 384-bit | 256-bit |
Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 256 GB/s? | 337 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
VRAM | 8GB | 8GB | 6GB | 4GB |
TDP | 180W | ? | 250W | 165W |
GPU | "GP104" | "GP104" | GM200 | GM204 |
Transistor Count | 7.2B | 7.2B | 8B | 5.2B |
Manufacturing Process | TSMC 16nm | TSMC 16nm | TSMC 28nm | TSMC 28nm |
Launch Price | $599 (Founders $699) | $379 (Founders $449) | $649 | $549 |
I've left out the TFlops figure as they don't translate directly into gaming performane. Also, we still ignore a lot of things about the 1070.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.