By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
hoala said:
JustBeingReal said:

Ratchet & Clank destroys MK8 visually, regardless of frame rate, there's no Wii U games that come anywhere close to the level of visuals in that game, as I said it's about as close to Pixar level visuals there has ever been in a video game. The level of textures are much better, geometry is much more complex, R&C is beyond MK8 in very single way, by a very big margin.

Then im sorry for you. The difference are almost none existing. The gap from 6th to 7th gen (or in case of nintendo wii to wii u scince they are 1 gen behind) is 20x as big. See my linked mario kart wii / 8 comparison video for this.

Mario kart 8 destorys mario kart wii in every aspect. Ratchet and Clank doesnt look much better then mario kart 8 in relation. I even put pictures to proove it into this. Ask 20 random people which photo from my OP looks better, you will most likely get 10 who say mario kart and 10 who say ratchet and clank. All the difference you claim to see is most likely placebo.

"I gave you examples of where gameplay has improved with more powerful technology. Horizon Zero Dawn is a huge open world game, with advanced physics, weather effects and dynamic lighting transitions from day to night are all in play, at the same time, something that wasn't really possible last gen in the way it's being used this generation. Plus the level of visuals."

Skyrim, read dead redemption, gta 5, Just cause 2, Far cry 3. Your welcome.

 

JustBeingReal said:

The notion that Nintendo would have to charge $600 to turn out a PS4 level handheld in 2017 is extremely false, the notion that such tech is even going to cost half of that is also false, especially when the most expensive component in that box wouldn't even cost $90, that's for a full SOC.

If something like that exists why isnt samsung or any other smartphone manufacture using this in smartphones instead of arm chip?

Why are gaming ultrabooks like the razer blade 14 incredible expensive, get extremly hot and have poor battery life?

Also feel free to give me a source to this.

The difference is enormous, every aspect of the details is well beyond MK8, that screen shot proves that by itself, shows you really don't get this.

Hell looking at character models, environments, everything and comparing them to any Nintendo game, it's not even a close comparison. Obviously you're going to continue denying it, but only the die hard of Nintendo fans would agree with you and they'd all be deluding themselves.

As for your examples, none are doing what Horizon is doing, hell even The Witcher 3 doesn't have advanced physics, weather, along with everything else in it's featureset and it's visuals still don't touch Horizon's.

Uncharted 4 is basically a Summer Action Blockbuster movie, boiled into a game, none of the 7th gen game examples you've given are doing everything that game encompasses, not in it's entirety. Your ignoring fact to suit your unsupported points.

 

The chips are too big for a smartphone, tablets have a bigger form factor and we're not talking about anything on the level of performance the Razer 14 uses, it packs an I7 and a GTX 970m, that GPU beats out an R9 270x in tests, in a notebook, it's more powerful than the PS4 is.

14nm hasn't even been released yet, hence why it's not in use in a device yet.

 

The sources are tests between GPU components and specs from AMD on their own website.

LMFAO you're asking for sources, when you haven't even linked a source to prove NX could be what you're claiming it to be. Where's a statement from Nintendo that supports your theory? Where's the leaks from reliable sources that state this is the kind of thing that Nintendo are doing.

How is this a fresh idea, that is something Nintendo would need to keep under wraps from Sony and Microsoft?

This concept of yours isn't appealing at all and your examples of games supposedly not doing anything more complex or improving gameplay are just non existant.