potato_hamster said:
What on earth are you talking about? |
This wasn't his point, and i think that a PS4K's Version would cost less than a Last generation version of some games, like Metal Gear Solid V, Far Cry 4.
I'm 100% against the PS4K, more job for the Devs, and more money on games, i will not believe it until a Official statement, this idea of "Upgradable Hardware" some rumors that came from Nintendo, Sony, and confusing Statements from Microsoft, is something i don't want to believe that is true.
What people are saying is that Developers will not support PS4K, because of the $ of the Development, or that some games would not came for neither normal PS4, or PS4K, as a result of this, what he is trying to say is that PS4+ PS4K is = much more return of Money than launching for any other console Combined, if Developers don't release games for PS4, as a protest against the PS4K, the protest don't have basis, the base would be "I'm spending more money to get the same sales", and some people are saying that in response of that they will not Release games for neither version of PS4, and release just for Xbox One, but with Xbox One, the development cost is higher than a PS4+PS4K Version, and games usually selling 2 times less on Xbox One, with some selling 3-6 times less.
Again, a console need to be really poor in sales to lose support from Third Party, and a Third Party Studios (the true Third Party) , not support the PS4K, need to be really really poor, a Version that means less than they were spending with Last gen Consoles, and Only needing less than 100-200K in Sales of the Neo Version, to pay the version, if all the games are made for the Base PS4, i don't think that a NEO's Version, would cost more than 10% of the Whole Development cost of the game, so if is something like The Witcher 3, for example, would need 5-6 Millions of US$ to pay itself, this is 100K Units in Revenue, with the profit of 200-300K Units already would be enought to pay that, Plus DLC and other things that can bring even more Profit.