By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
vivster said:

You're turing in circles and your arguments don't make sense.

So you prefer a a device that is stronger, has a new platform, possibly does not feature backwards compatibility and has exclusive games forcing customers to upgrade. Over a device that is stronger, has the same platform, definitely does feature backwards compatibility, has no exclusive games, making it optional and as such consumer friendly.

I will never get you people.

Thank you!!! Hit the nail right on the head. This is exactly why I have been saying I don't understand where some of them are coming from. Ah well.......

You forget the arbitrary time number and other factors.

For example, an upgrade after 4 years(NX) is absolutely fine because reasons. 3 years however(PS4K) is a sin against humanity and should be purged. Except if it's called New 3DS.

You can also only release a new console when the old one is not selling well(WiiU). But under no circumstances you can release one if the previous console still sells well(PS4). Except if it's called 3DS.

Those are just some of the very important facts which are based on the science which I will call consology.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.