| RolStoppable said: Afterwards I said that it is illogical. In your quote above, you are saying that each hardware refresh will be underutilized during its first three years, so the part "more technological progress" of my quote doesn't hold true. But like I said, it's illogical. If developers aren't supposed to make full use of the hardware refresh's specs until three years later, then wouldn't make it more sense for consumers and developers alike that a hardware refresh doesn't launch in the first place and instead a properly supported update of the hardware launches after six years? The way you describe it, it just creates an unnecessary step in the middle. |
But how is that really different from what happens now? And if u read the article you would see that too.
Now new hardware comes out, and there is a learning process. 3-4yrs into the hardwares life you satrt seeing things that truly take advantage of the hardware. That's basically what will be happening with these mid gen transitions too. just that the learning process years will be shorter cause they are all working with the same tools and/engines just over different specced hardware.
