Volterra_90 said:
The problem with that OpenCritic RT-like score is that they consider "not recommended" a score behind 75, I think. At least based on scores and the percentage. Metacritic says that any game behind 75 is a mixed response too. I think that nowadays they have to lower that mark. I get that before everything which was behind an 80 was a shitty review, but now, you can read reviews with a 70 score that speaks well of the game. In fact, a 70/100 it's not a bad score at all, and gaming reviews are changing, they're now harsher, so it's ridiculous to keep the same "<75 = bad game". I was saying the same this gen with games like QB or SF:Zero. That's the way it is now. At least I think so. |
If that's the way then it's not right because critics are harsher now.
