Veknoid_Outcast said:
I have to disagree with you binary. It's a totally petulant and amateurish move, and it reflects poorly on the author and on Polygon. If he doesn't want to review a game he can always pass it along to someone else on staff. By starting and not finishing (a two hour game, mind you) he does a disservice to the game, his readers, and his profession. As someone who's worked as a journalist in print and electronic media, I find his actions embarrassing. If he was an amateur blogger he could get away with that garbage. A paid professional at Polygon? No way. |
I think writing an article about how shit the game is (which is a review in itself in a way) and his decision to not review it was the wrong thing to do. Which is a bad editorial decision. Deciding not to review the game, in consultation with his boss, is no problem at all. I'm sure his employer didn't just say, "OK well we'll pay you anyway and you can just go blob for those hours instead." People talking like the guy is being paid to do nothing. I'm sure he's still got to use those hours productively for his employer, and perhaps his employer decided his hours would be more productively used on other things.
Perhpas Ploygon thought it needed to give its readers a reason why a game like SFZ isn't getting reviewed. It's a high profile Nintendo IP, so you'd expect a major publication to review SFZ. But perhaps just not reviewing the game and being silent is the better option here.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix