Nuvendil on 20 April 2016
| LivingMetal said: Look... I don't condone slavery, and I do not know the reasoning behind originally choosing Andrew Jackson for the $20. But as a male member of the human species of Asian decent with roots from South America, WHO THE HELL IS GONNA REPRESENT ME ON A PIECE OF AMERICAN LEGAL TENDER? |
Probably had to do with him being a war hero as well as some of the good things he did as president like completely get the country out of debt. Not saying he was an excellent president, but he was a fair bit better than the majority. But removing him cause he owned slaves is a pathetic excuse. George Wachington owned over a hundred. I'm not all that miffed, I just find it silly and a waste of government time and resources.
