By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
OttoniBastos said:
COKTOE said:

And most men are starting with a much better baseline than most woman. Apply the same training to a man, and he's still going to be much further ahead. In any physical test.

It's not a competition though.It's about having the best soldiers that maximize the mission success and minimize potential losses.

Like i said in that post,i don't mind affirmative actions in normal day jobs where nobody's life is at stake, but the moment we start letting people who are objectively less capable to archieve the best performance get into a job where best performance possible is crucial then we have a problem.

Besides,If women start with a worse baseline(which depends of the indiviual) they should do more and not less to compensate that.

EDIT:sorry for the double post.

What do you know about that? How do you maximize the efficiency of a modern army up? Is it physically or mechanically?

What's the training regiment of US soldiers do you know? They sit more in the classroom or shoot house/range than lifting weight.

What you're rambling about affirmative action? This is not a political dispute you want it to be.