Bandorr said:
I didn't get stuck there either. Yet you are actually avoiding his REAL points. You are saying "he is bad at this game, so none of his points matter". That is as biased thinking as possible. He actually shows everything backing up his point. Yet you aren't arguing "well that part isn't hard". You are arguing "you suck, so you must be biased". That isn't how actual adults have a discussion. It is like the "pro golfer" saying "they are great" without any proof, and the "amateur golfer" saying they aren't good - and offering up tons of video proof. You are just going to ignore him because he doesn't fit your agenda, and doesnt meet your level of experience. You aren't even trying to discussion his points about the game - you are trying to avoid them all because he was bad at certain points. You are throwing out the baby with the bath water. Are you going to go look for video reviews of people that gave this game high scores and see if they suck? No because you are very much biased. You are only looking for people that gave it bad scores and saying they don't fit your agenda and your way of playing. Infact you seem so very determined to ignore any points and just claim "your biased, your score doesn't count" - this wil be my last post. |
This is a thread to show how bad some reviewers were at the game. I showed some videos to prove it.
You are the one putting into question their ability to evaluate the game as a whole. I just questioned their opinion on gameplay.







