Bandorr said:
That may one of the saddest comments I've seen to date. That is along the lines of if you can't win a race -you can't judge the race. If you can't pitch a no hitter - you can't judge if someone is a good pitcher or not. A good point is a good point. You aren't even trying to argue against their points. You are trying to slander them and by virtue of doing that - discredit anything they are saying. It is a very cheap tactic. Infact.. hold on I have to google which version of irony this is. Yes I believe this is situational Irony. You attempt to discount peoples opinion believing them to be "biased" yet in doing so - and without trying to count any of their points you show your self to be far more biased than any of the reviews. Anyone with an english major feel free to see if I got that right or not. |
I have an English major and your criticism sucks, period. XD
Reviewers are supposed to criticise a game based on their experience. Just like me and you.
A better analogy in this case would be, a newb golf player given a high quality set of iron to play golf to play, then asked to describe its quality. Would you trust his/her judgement, if you know they're bad/have no experience at the game?
