Kasz216 said:
BringBackChrono said:
kasz my friend
doesnt middle-east sound like a geographical position to you?
and im sorry to say, india lies in south eastern asia.
and i think human rights can afford to take a back seat to development in the developing countries,because human rights aint exactly what feeds the people.
as you mentioned your friend,there must be other people too who'd want their human rights.but that number is smaller than the people who get fed thanks to the system.when these numbers get reversed, i assure you, the government will be compelled to shape up. but until that day comes, i think its no one elses damn business what goes on there,as long as mass-murder of political opponents or innocent citizens doesnt take place.
and whats wrong with the olympics?
US shows off its strength and magnificence to the world on a yearly basis
cant little China do it too? |
So you didn't read my post at all. It's the most "polite" way to say arab over here. When you say Arab, people get upset, sort of like when you say black. Instead of saying middleastern despite not everyone being from the middle east, and african american even though for all you know the guy could be british.
|
See, I don't get this calling people African-American at all. Why even bother. They are just Americans. Like your example, he isn't African-British. He is just British
