By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:
JEMC said:

The main problem with it being 14nm is that AMD only produces the Jaguar cores in the 28nm process, and I doubt they're willing to bring Jaguar to 14nm having Puma around. And they can't use both processes together with one APU.

That said, the fastest Jaguar processor was the 2.05GHz Athlon 5350. Has AMD made a faster version of the CPU? Is the leak incorrect and Neo uses Puma cores? And if the leak is incorrect in that part, what else can be wrong/false?

The whole thing. It makes absolute no sense for Sony to do this.

Indeed. I'm on the camp of those that believe that PS4K is nothing more than a PS4 with 4K media capabilities, but we're a minority.

HoloDust said:
JEMC said:

The main problem with it being 14nm is that AMD only produces the Jaguar cores in the 28nm process, and I doubt they're willing to bring Jaguar to 14nm having Puma around. And they can't use both processes together with one APU.

That said, the fastest Jaguar processor was the 2.05GHz Athlon 5350. Has AMD made a faster version of the CPU? Is the leak incorrect and Neo uses Puma cores? And if the leak is incorrect in that part, what else can be wrong/false?

I don't know, even if it's not 36CUs, but rather something like 380X/M395X, unless they are designing PS4K to be more like PS3, I'm not sure they could cram so much CUs into such a small space and TDP on 28nm...but I guess we'll just have to wait a bit longer, they don't hide their specs.

Yeah, that's true. Sony isn't shy to disclose the hardware they use on their machines.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.