JEMC said:
I'm not exactly a tech head, but I'll answer you. AMD doesn't have a GPU with that configuration, 1024:64:16, but it has something very similar in the GPU inside the R7 370 with a config of 1024:64:32. That sounds better, right? Well, no it doesn't. It turns out that that GPU is worse than the one inside the PS4, that has a config of 1152:72:32. To have 2x specs of the PS4, the NX would need something like the R9 380X which is 2048:128:32, but the reality is that that only works on paper. Here is a comparison between the R7 370 and the R9 380X to show you what I mean: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1590?vs=1592 To have twice the performance of a PS4 you would need something like the R9 390X, and that's too expensive and uses too much power for a console. |
I definitely don't think its 2x PS4, that talk got out of hand when 14nm got mentioned. I bring up Fiji as that's the updated quote. For performance, the r9 nano's 8.192 tf @ 175w seems to be the best at 28nm. I was wondering if Nintendo could get a cut down/customized version, and if the TDP would drop accordingly (by half or more?). i.e. how much can TDP be reduced from 175w, with a lower core config that compares more/less or between XB1 - PS4.
edit @JEMC
I do look at that comparison chart, and compared Fiji Pro to Fiji XT.








