By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
IllegalPaladin said:
sieanr said:
Blue3 said:
leo-j said:
Here's the thing if kotaku guy wateverhis name is goes to the ps place and would compare halo 3 to the new killzone what do you think he would say?

hard to say, kotaku are retards.

...


Yeah, its such an easy comparison that even kotakutrads should get it. Prerendered CG vs a real game

Has everyone forgotten Killzone 1? Sony tried to hype it just as much.

How about one of the first Halo 2 teasers? The one I'm thinking of is when the Master Chief is walking to the airlocked doors while radio chatter is played in the background. While this is going on, it constantly cuts to his 'mission objectives' and then jumps into space? (The actual version of that is when he takes that bomb and carries it off the ship in the first(?) level).

 

 

Another example of misleading advertising. Sony and Microsoft are guilty of this.

Still, this doesn't invalidate the stupidity of claiming a game that has no released screens or real info is going to look better than a game that has tons of screens available. Killzone could be anything, no one really knows yet.


Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away"