By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Areaz32 said:
Pemalite said:

Quantum Break is a horrible port. In-fact... If you have a monitor with a higher refresh rate, Quantum break actually runs at a higher fps.
That's right... You can have a Mid-range PC and beat out a PC with Dual Titans because your monitor refreshes faster.

I have no idea what "DAS3" is.

DAS3 = Dark souls 3. It takes 970 or 390 to do it.

You still have to spend a lot more money than consoles to get games running at 60fps 1080p across the board. Else you will have some games run at a variable framerate which is arguably worse than solid or just stick to the console framerates which by that point it wouldn't matter too much to have said more expensive PC.

A GTX 970 allows for 1080P max graphics, higher graphics than the consoles and with twice the framerates.
A GTX 970 will do 45-60fps, Max graphics at 1440P/Quad-High Definition.

A Geforce 960 with a couple of settings lowered will do 1080P 60fps and still look better than the PS4.
A Radeon 7850, which is similar to the GPU in the PS4 will do PS4 levels of graphics at 30fps. That's a mid-range card, better can be had for about $120 USD off newegg. (Radeon 270.)

Dark Souls has been RENOWNED for it's shotty PC ports... Patch 1.03 allowed a heap of users who were only getting 20-30fps to now get rock solid 60fps, AMD and nVidia have been improving the game with drivers.
http://segmentnext.com/2016/04/12/dark-souls-3-pc-crashes-bugs-freezes-low-fps-game-fixes/

You couldn't have picked two better examples to try and backup your argument... Both are crap console ports that require more work after release.
On the bright side. At-least the PC CAN do 1080P 60fps in every game. ;)




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite