| Peh said: I'll just show you why I am done with you. You say: "All I saw were ad hominem fallacies such as your "Seem to be Islamophobic" statement, as if that added anything useful." This is not my statement, but the statement of alternet.org. I additionally wrote: "How much truth there is won't be judged by me. But I saw it worth by posting it." And also to all the criticism of that source I wrote: "But OK.. let's assume that is true for Germany.. the crime rate increased in the recent months or years." Because you doesn't seem to understand english very well, let me explain to you what the last sentence means. It means, that despite ALL MY CRITICISM for that souce, I go with the whole truth of it to see where it is going next. And amazingly, you ignored that sentence aswell. You say: "You judged GateStone Institute and Bild by their backgrounds. I, on the other hand, judge by a point-by-point basis". No you didn't. You are a liar. How can you verify the statement in those articles are true? By checking the sources of course. But these sources are not accessible. You are intellectual dishonest and you try to push your insults and false agenda towards me. Meaning... the source you've provided leads to a biased position on this subject and not an objective one. You plainly ignored this and went on with your rampant towards me. I've posted several links and doing my research on the high rate of rapes done by immigrants in sweden. Posted statistics of different countries related to rape by capita. Like: http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate Because what you and Slimebeast did was taking this as a base for the whole of Europe. Which was also intellectual dishonest. The table and figures you've wanted. You plainly ignored them and again, pushed you agenda towards me, while also insulting me. You say: "You, on the other hand, used a study of immigrants from the United States to justify your position on migrants in Europe, attempting to force a square peg into a round hole." You still are running like a maniac around that circle while I said SEVERAL posts ago: "Oh right... must missed that bit of all the plain generalization going on here, my bad" MEANING: I take this one back. Yet, you keep hammering on that one all the time like it's worth something for your misguided argumentation. How desperate are you really? You say: " I love how you accuse me of posting videos that site studies as if that's a bad thing. It just comes to show how anti-empirical you are." And thank you very much for posting this: "Since when does "Migrants are overrepresented in crime statistics" is equivalent to labelling a whole culture and religion as criminals? " Because this, is the pure empirical evidence, that you have no fucking clue what my point is in this whole stupid discussion. Go back several pages and look at my original post which Slimebeast attacked me for. Maybe then, it would make *click* in your head. The rest of your post is just repeating the same crap over again. You have an issue with reading and understanding what someone says.
You are intellectual dishonest. |
The Islamophobic comment was wholly unneccessary, but you thought it was still worth pointing out. You also made that Fox News comparison with Bild.de which is again, another ad hominem. You were criticizing Bild.de for its background rather than the content that was referenced.
And I have to laugh at your false accusations of me being a liar. Stating facts is apparently the equivalent to lying and having an agenda. I like how you claim that I took Sweden's statistics as the base for all of Europe when I showed Angry Foreigner citing sources that show similar trends in Norway, Denmark, and Finland. In addition, I also showed that the influx of migrants have caused a dramatic rise in crime rates in Germany. So I'm not lying, you are and you're apparently desperate, too.
Oh, and I have several more videos to show you if you are curious. This is just the tip of the iceberg. And what do you know, another ad hominem! :D Criticizing the manner of how I present evidence rather than criticizing the actual evidence. I wonder who's the actual intellectual(ly) dishonest one here...
So, to top this off, I should put these final tidbits:
- Most of the immigrants aren't refugees. About 60% are actually economic migrants.
- Immigrants from the MENA region are overrepresented in crime statistics in countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. In contrast, immigrants from other countries such as Signapore or Japan are not overrepresented.
- The influx of migrants has caused a significant rise in crime in Germany from 2014 to 2015.
- In England, the majority of muslims do not believe homosexuality should be legal, 2 in 5 muslims believe that the wife should always obey her husband, and 1 in 4 muslims want to impose sharia law.
- Bosnia is suffering from the significant presence of sharia villages.
- A lot of these migrants come from countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, etc. and according to Pew Research, overwhelming majorities advocate for illiberal views such as killing homosexuals and making women always subservient to men.
And I bet after reading those bullet points, you are tempted to use the "I can't stand bigots that over-generalize a culture and a religion" line again because surely the ad nauseaum fallacy certainly helps. Looking at these statistics I've stated above, it is rather clear that the migrants' attitudes are a major problem in Europe. And what is the source for their attitudes? The cultures of their countries of origin. What is the source for their cultures? Fundamental Islam or Islamism, for short. And when you read the Quran, it advocates for some of the most horrendous things like turning non-muslim women into sex slaves. Mohammed was also not the... best role model. See the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah and Taqiya as examples. Things like this need to be acknowledged, but instead, some countries like Germany and Sweden opted to cover up serious incidents, where the latter even went as far as to IP ban an article and any valid criticisms of Islam are silenced. This needs to stop as people are allowed to criticize Islam as much as they are allowed to criticize other religions.
