| Peh said: How do I take a source as credible? Doing backround checks of course. And you jump at me just for checking it? For verifying it? Oh boy. You just eat everything you are being feeded, right? No suprise you are so off and post videos with sources you didn't even looked at. Everything what fits your agenda, huh? |
You call that background checks? All I saw were ad hominem fallacies such as your "Seem to be Islamophobic" statement, as if that added anything useful. You judged GateStone Institute and Bild by their backgrounds. I, on the other hand, judge by a point-by-point basis. Unlike the links you referenced, I post mine in the correct context and in addition, they actually have citations. You, on the other hand, used a study of immigrants from the United States to justify your position on migrants in Europe, attempting to force a square peg into a round hole. I love how you accuse me of posting videos that site studies as if that's a bad thing. It just comes to show how anti-empirical you are.
|
Just to sum it up: *Calls me unconfomfortable, because I don't like people labeling a whole culture and religion as criminals. |
- Strawman fallacy. You seem to like to use this one a lot, do you? Since when does "Migrants are overrepresented in crime statistics" is equivalent to labelling a whole culture and religion as criminals? You are uncomfortable because you have been using that line ad nauseaum when most people have not over-generalized.
- I provided them, but you didn't. You decided to turn the blind eye just like how Germany decided to turn a blind eye to the Cologne sexual assaults. The figures and tables are there for you to see in Angry Foreigner's video and description. Why are you so reluctant to look the data up yourself? And while Statista's data is behind a paywall, why didn't you check on its reputation?
- Ah, there you go with the ad hominem once again. Criticize how the person is just a "random YouTube guy" and links sources in different languages rather than critiquing his actual arguments and data, so yes, you are ignoring Angry Foreigner. Not once, did I see comments like "I don't think the data is credible because so-and-so didn't use proper methodology" or anything else that is logically sound from you.
| I'm certainly done with the delusion you call worldview.
Good Day, Sir. I'll ask a mod to close this thread. |
I'm getting the "I don't like what you're saying, so I'm asking a mod to close this thread so you can't say stuff anymore" vibe. So instead of correcting your fallacies and attempt to find other sources that support your point, you have taken the censorship route. Oh, and I didn't call whatever "delusion" you're talking about as worldview, so ease off on the phantom arguments.
