By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GribbleGrunger said:
KLAMarine said:

What's wrong with replayability?

Where is he saying there's something wrong with replayability?

I read the following: "This is more like it. Games should be this long at least."

Which seems to imply there's something wrong with games shorter than said length. This was followed by: "That way games aren't relying on "replayability," which differs from person to person."

Again, as if to say relying on replayability is bad.

No problem though, midrange just told me there's nothing wrong with replayability.

midrange said:
KLAMarine said:

What's wrong with replayability?

Nothing is wrong with it, it's just different per person. It's like side quests in RPGs. Some people enjoy side quests, others may not. replaying levels to discover different paths in star fox is similar. Some people may like them, others may not.

That's why a game shouldn't rely on replayability. Games should place more emphasis on campaign or online modes or so on to appeal to everyone.

Most online modes rely on replayability.