| Sicilian. said: If you want to play them in order Metal Gear Solid 3 -------------Playstation 2 Metal Gear Solid: Po-----------PSP Metal Gear 1--------------------NES/ Or Packed With MGS 3 Substience Metal Gear 2 Solid Snake-----NES/ Or Packed With MGS 3 Substience Metal Gear Solid 1--------------PSONE/GAMECUBE----i'd say go with gamecube Metal Gear Solid 2-------------PS2 Metal Gear Solid 4-------------PS3 If you are just asking which is better between Metal Gear Solid 3 and 2. Well then MGS 3 blows 2 out of the water in every aspect If your talking about the two versions of each game Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance and Metal Gear Solid 3: Substanice (spelling) are the better versions |
No. Always play games in the order they were released. Same with movies and books. The surprises at the end of the games will not be as effective if you play them out of order.
Metal Gear 1 and Metal Gear 2 is unneccesary if you play MGS1 first and read the back story from there.
Then MGS2.
MGS3.
Portable Ops.
Cheapest option is going with MGS: Essential Collection for $30 as others have said.
If you have a GC (or Wii), Twin Snakes (aka MGS1) has updated graphics and controls from MGS2. Then MGS2: Substance, then MGS3: Subsistence. But since this would cost a lot more (and some people here think Twin Snakes is overdone), just get the $30 Collection. That's what it's there for.
