| Aerys said: So every person who gave à 4 and said the shooting is boring is just à bad gamer ? That seems far fetched |
Yes, Some people just can't accept the truth that Quantum Break was just an average game by its review scores.
SO now its anybody who gave Quatum Break a bad score just doesn't know how to play games "properly"...yes that's it.
This comes after months & years of mocking PS4 exclusives for having "bad" metacritic scores. Now with this, that their AAA flagship exclusive title has a score only a handfull of points above those "crappy" PS4 exclusives, now metacritic is bad and the reviewers are "clowns" that dont know how to play games.
Nevermind the fact that most reviewers, 57%, gave Quantum Break an average score (<=80) and that it wasn't only a handful of them that gave the game a bad score (<=65) it was 14%. The metacritic score us now 77 which is within a handful of points of games like Driveclub (71) or Killzone (73) which I always thought were examples of games that were dissappointments.
A good game is one with a metacritic score of 85 or higher. This is a good measure because with a high number of scored reviews its hard for a single or even a handfull of "trolling" reviews to effect the overall score that much.
