| Shadow1980 said: Is anyone being directly and demonstrably harmed by VR CGI porn? Is it causing you physical injury, damaging your property, or stealing anything from you if someone faps to what amounts to a cartoon character? I believe the answer to those questions is "No." Therefore, it should not be banned. While actual child pornography is and should remain banned (because its production necessarily involves harming a minor), other forms of obscenity, especially those containing non-real "people" (including crude CGI representations of famous people), should be considered protected speech. If it doesn't hurt you or anyone else directly, then the government has no business meddling in the situation. And no, "Doing it for their own good" ("they" being consumers of pornography) isn't sufficient grounds, either. The government shouldn't be in the business of protecting individuals from their own vices, whether it be porn or alcohol or weed. If they aren't hurting anyone else then nobody has a right to impose their will on them. |
This. Well said.
