By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Swordmasterman on 02 April 2016
Edit Thread
CGI-Quality said:
Swordmasterman said:

Big games like Quantum Break,   the Average is higher than 80, you want to say that a Game is Mediucre only when it score the 50 on Metacritic ?, Call of Duty Black Ops 3, Star Wars Battlefront, and Destiny, are mediucre scores for what a Big game would be, a Game will very hardly score 50 on Metacritic, or 60, because this is the Average score of Dozens of sites, some will give it a 10/10, others a 2/10.

Mediucre, does not means that is bad, but also does not means that is good, and the 70-79,  already are low scores, IGN, gave 9, and GameSpot, gave 4, there are very different oppinions, we are not discussing the Quality of Quantum Break, we are just discussing about in what Number a Game is considered mediucre, compared to others, Alan Wake, did 83 on Metacritic, this is a good score, 78, is much below.

I'm not sure why the definition of the word must be changed to fit an argument. A mediocre "anything" means it is not good.

Also, nobody's personal view of Quantum Break has ever been a point of discussion, here. It's very simple - I asked for a criteria that puts a 78 in the "mediocre" box. Jason's latest response sums it up, which means I can continue to look at that score as above average. Whether we're talking books, digital media, education, or what have you.

Is Because Metacritic, don't have a Criterion for those scores, the site pick Random reviews that use different criterions, and put them, all Together, other  places don't do this, is just One Person or One Team's opinion.