Teeqoz said:
You are thinking of it as more like a very long but finite list of 9s. 0.000...1 wouldn't work. You can't have an infinite number of zeroes followed by a 1, because the zeroes go on forever, there is no end, so there will never be a zero after which you can place the 1. It's like saying "There's a 1 in the infiniteth decimal place". That decimal place doesn't exist, because if it did, it would have been finite. |
The same is true for 0.999999999 though.
Why do you have it work for one thing but not another?
The proof looks solid enough though, the concept itself is what I have a hard time wrapping my mind around.
Note Im not saying that 0 is the same as 0.0000000 ect 1.
Im saying that 0.99999999 will always be missing that 0.00000000 ect 1 part, that keeps it from being a pure 1.







