Because this sets a very bad precedent..
There is a reason why the console market is not ..again "not " the PC market.
The blurring of the console market & the PC together is on a whole in my opinion a very bad thing..increase hardware cost before not even mid cycle , than the PS5 what release 3 to 5 years later? What's the point, than of trying to keep the hardware standard as a single system you buy into for the life of the cycle..setting a cycle for one model to not even be 4 years before refresh is complicating the whole point of the console space when you do not need to do that..the PC already has that..why turn the console market into a Pseudo PC market..it just makes the idea of even having a console market redundant. In my opinion.
That does not key of promotes stability for your platform..unless its one unified platform, I mean would that than be two separate firmware updates while your at it one made for each..release a mid cycle upgrade Now you have the original, the upgrade and than the new next gen, system than any other legacy systems to boot.
Do let's see in Sony's case what we are talking here
PSVita
PS3
PS4
PS4.5
Than a PS5 to boot...
I mean yeah..why not right. When everyone is saying oh' Sony just a security update for stability..where is my extra functions.
Hey Sony your Playstation network is down even more now.
/Rolls Eyes
I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.
