Teeqoz said:
Well, I did say this hypothetical girl was 10 (though we could say 12 or whatever). The important part is that she's underage (I mean, I would've said she was 14, but afaik the age of consent some places is 13, so that wouldn't work.
The point I was trying to get across is that it's not *only* about wether or not someone was hurt in the making of the content. In some way or another, it's also a matter of principle. |
fair enough, I can have my own preferences, but I can't dictate my taste preferences on other people's fantasies. since the beggining the discussion was from an artistic censure standpoint, so i'm talking about drawings, videogames, works of fiction. I don't really know why people get this uptight whenever it comes to sex and their entire reasoning and logic goes out the window when it comes to it.
i'm sure most of the people here have killed thousands of virtual characters, decapitated them, cut off limbs, exploded entire cities and performed the biggest atrocities ever. if any of us would have done in real life what we've done in videogames, we'd be in the history books next to the likes of stalin or hitler.
but hey, if you play a videogame where 2 virtual characters are having sex... oh oh oh........... now that's a bridge too far.
killing is cool, sex... what's wrong with you? :)