By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MortienGerrux said:
As a 4K TV owner and 4K gamer, I can tell you, anything else then full native 3840x2160 looks like somebody smeared vaseline over your TV. I've tried 2560x1440 and 3200x1800 and they still don't look remotely close to real 4K.

It would rather be smart to focus on 1920x1080 60FPS first.

but will look a lot better than 1080p

 

Mummelmann said:
Ruler said:

its possible dueto the smaller size of the AMD APU. They could double the performacne at 500$~ price tag next year

It's just not doable on mainstream devices yet, not even close. My 4000$ rig is running games in 1440p with max effects at around 70-80fps, if I up the resolution to 4k, those figures drop into the 30's. 3k isn't too far off in terms of hardware requirements and any mainstream device is at least half a decade behind my rig in sheer hardware output.

Put shortly; it won't happen. Not yet. Heck; the PS4 and One are still struggling with 1080p and 60fps gaming with any effects enabled.

well i was talking about 3k 30fps for PS4.5 which takes half as much power than 4k