zero129 said:
Areaz32 said:
You still haven't shown me any pictures.
Besides the res of The Order 1886 doesn't sacrifice the pixel density. the 16bit era didn't do this.. (wtf are you talking about)
I have played Crysis 3 on max and yes it looks great but the fidelity of the character models, lighting and shadow effects are just not as good. Neither are the z-buffer effects. Crysis 3, ROTR, QB and Star Citizen does not have anything that looks as CGI as the picture above does.
Graphics fidelity is the most important thing in determining how good the graphics are. Video game graphics is a term used to describe the various techniques used to display video games.
"and a FPS of less then 30 just so it can look that good??."
Come on what. The game runs 30fps solidly. What are you talking about.
Besides my point was just that consoles are not behind when they can produce visuals like the ones above. PC needs to prove (with pictures please) how dominant it is in graphics because so far Crysis 3 doesn't show me anything that actually looks more CGI (ie. better) than The Order 1886 or Uncharted 4 does.
|
Trust me i know how this goes. I could post 100's of pics that look better then this and you would deny everyone of them so im not going to get into it.
If you believe a closed, sub 1080P@less then 30 FPS game looks better then the others named just cos its exclusive, then the is nothing more i can do for you since im not going to go around in circles here.
And yes consoles are behind for the very reason i stated above. Alot of sacrafices had to be made to get them visuals.
|
All i asked was for you to show me a PC game that looked more CGI.
You lied about the framerate... and now you are lying about The Order 1886 being closed. There are several open environments.
I thought the rocket launcher, sniper and just in general most shooting sections were fairly commonly known.
