VR - PS4 vs PC

[Areaz32]

zero129 said:

Areaz32 said:

* could you give an example? I have yet to see any pc game with the graphics fidelity of driveclub or the order 1886. Keyword here is graphics fidelity.

** Nope you are projecting your own misinformation onto reality here. The graphics we currently get are a generation ahead of the previous decade. If you look at Uncharted 4 and then on The Last of Us remastered then you will see that your arguement is completely shot down.

*** You might be right, but would you care to give some examples?

**** and this is where you dropped the chain. The graphics of Crysis 3 are not on the level of The Order 1886 or Driveclub for that matter. They use outdated rendering techniques by todays standards. Thie PBR solution is outdated along with their lighting system. 

http://i.imgur.com/8jSgo2D.jpg

Until you can show me pictures from Crysis 3 that has the z-buffer + shader fidelity in display here, you have something to prove.

When it comes to resoloution you are no longer talking about graphics fidelity. PC will always have an advantage in FPS + resoloution. 

The API stuff you talk about towards the end might very well get an improvement on PC, but at the same time PC's still have non-static hardware which means the optimization can never be as in depth as consoles.

3rd party developers have reported that they see at least a 60% performance boost in comparison to equal hardware on PC. Keyword 3rd party.

The first party games always look way better than the 3rd party games.

Rise of Tomb Raider, QB, Star Citizen are all games that has this beat easy on PC, and trust me you should go play Crysis 3 on max settings.. cos yes it does also beat The Order in a number of areas..

One more thing. Your bragging about "Graphic" fidelity like thats the only thing that matters in games. Would you really enjoy playing all games if they played like a movie in some strange res that make borders (Where no longer in the 16 bit era people!) and a FPS of less then 30 just so it can look that good??.

One more thing!. Just cos a game is also using a newer lighting tech or shader etc does not auto mean a game that isnt using that same shader etc cant look better!. And this is a silly argumement to try make imo.

You still haven't shown me any pictures.

Besides the res of The Order 1886 doesn't sacrifice the pixel density. the 16bit era didn't do this.. (wtf are you talking about)

I have played Crysis 3 on max and yes it looks great but the fidelity of the character models, lighting and shadow effects are just not as good. Neither are the z-buffer effects. Crysis 3, ROTR, QB and Star Citizen does not have anything that looks as CGI as the picture above does.

Graphics fidelity is the most important thing in determining how good the graphics are. Video game graphics is a term used to describe the various techniques used to display video games. 

"and a FPS of less then 30 just so it can look that good??."

Come on what. The game runs 30fps solidly. What are you talking about.

Besides my point was just that consoles are not behind when they can produce visuals like the ones above. PC needs to prove (with pictures please) how dominant it is in graphics because so far Crysis 3 doesn't show me anything that actually looks more CGI (ie. better) than The Order 1886 or Uncharted 4 does.