By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
Nautilus said:

The problem with comparing gens is that you see the whole picture, and while a gen may have excellent games, or even industry-changers, it gets watered down by the games that are not so good.I personally loved gen 7 too, but against the library of ps2, Nintendo 64(for me at least), SNES, PS1, and so on, it gets hard to rate it higher than those.Again, this all is my personal opinion, not facts

Gen 5 is one of the worst imo. It had some great games, but most of them have aged horribly.

For most PS1 games, graphic-wise, surely.Gamplay-wise, many games still play excellent today.Most of them are turn based, but still excellent.Nintendo 64 games I will have to disagree.Sure, they are not the eye-candy that they were back in the day, but those graphics retain such charm.In my opinion, Ocarina, Mario 64, Goldeney, and those highly aclaimed titles that launched on it are still good graphic-wise.

 

But I also think that comparing games as they are now isnt fair.I mean, even gen 7 will look terrible in 20 years.It should be compared by the impact it had at the time it launched, for both gens



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1