By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aura7541 on 22 March 2016
Edit Thread
MortienGerrux said:
Aura7541 said:

1. Yes, it does. Proof By Assertion is not a valid argument. Other people's firsthand experience with PSVR trumps your lack of experience with PSVR 24/7.
2. So are there as many people how have Oculus/Vive capable PCs as PS4s? Are there as many PC owners who already have the camera/Move equivalents?
3. If you're going to show the minimum requirements, show all of them. You're technically lying by omission. But let's put that aside, what about more intensive games? After all, indie games aren't the only types of games that will be on VR.

1) I haven't tried PSVR yet but I do know that if I set my DK2 to 60hz It's literally unplayable.

2) I wouldn't really know. As long as the device has a HDMI 1.3 and two USB 3.0 ports it CAN RUN THE HEADSET. It's just a display, not special until you run a game on it. Intel HD graphics will be able to run some very basic games like Skyrim or Fallout 3.

3) So you are trying to compare the graphically intesive games on the PC versus the games on the PSVR? Oculus recommends a GTX 970 or a R9 290 for the more graphically intensive games.

1. Another Red Herring as you failed to address how reinterpolation doesn't work.

2. You're going off-track as my original point was that you have to take into existing PS4 owners into account, where there are approximately 40 millioin of them currently. Oh, and the answer to my 2nd question is no. The Move has been around for ages with the PS4 camera being in the market since the PS4's launch. The Oculus and Vive equivalents aren't out yet, in contrast.

3. Oh, so now you mention the other requirements. However, can a $400 PC run graphically intensive games as well as or better than the PSVR? Can I get a PC with the GTX 970 or R9 290 for around the same price as a PS4?