Chazore said: I do turn them off but having to turn them off clearly shows that what they are doing just isn't worth it, the epformance cost is definitely not worth it, not from the benches I'm seeing and the folk going "you don't need this, turn it off", if it actually gave huge gains then we'd be seeing tons more of "you cannot live without this, keep it turned on, it;s always well more than worth it". Nvidia aren't godlike perfect either and not everything is demanding by default, you can make a game demanding that doesn't give you much if any gains at all and you can make something demanding that actually gives you a lot more than you bargained for. The visual gains are dependent from user to user and I know that not everything has to be demanding but some of the stuff in GameWorks is cutting edge RESEARCH! (Frustum-traced raster shadows in Tom Clancy's The Division only materialized on a PAPER LAST year.) Yeah you totally are but I just don't agree with how this is gone about because my money isn't worth a damn if I'm not getting what I want, I want what I pay for, not "oh I see you paid 1 and a half grand for your PC, tisk, should have spend another 2k to get a better experience", it's like being told by the very company you buy from that you'll get the best possible experience but find out each time that you never will unless you jump through their yearly card releases each month or two, spending thousands upon thousands because they cba to actually allow for your card to breathe and actually perform. It's just the way things are, even if PC gamers with Nvidia cards are discontent with GameWorks they are likely just the few voices out of the many who will actually switch or maybe not but who knows. For me, may the winner get my money even if they have to play dirty ... |