Azzanation said:
Instead the Goverment can have a nice look at your room while the PS Camera studies you.. Interesting stuff. Alot of gamers blew Kinect out of the water because they didnt want a camera looking at them, yet there probably posting on there Smart phone or there built in Web Cams. Either way its funny how it goes from hate to love real quickly all because another brand does it. While they complained about 1 camera looking at them (Kinect), there willing to accept 2 cameras (PSVR, PS Camera) instead with high praise lol |
Because Microsoft was caught with their pants down providing the government (NSA specifically) a backdoor key to anything the NSA wanted, encrypted or not. So to announce in that same year that you're releasing a console that has a forced in camera and is always on, requires a daily Internet checkin, with facial/voice recognition? Hmm that doesn't sound fishy.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/11/microsoft-nsa-collaboration-user-data
Its easy to see why the Kinect has been shunned. Beyond the scope of that argument, you're comparing a camera that augments you onto the tv vs a headset that immerses you in an electronic world not yet explored by the general population. I don't think there's any kind of hypocritical thinking involved in wanting virtual reality
