Pavolink said:
Goodnightmoon said:
Except Takashi Tezuka himself said that the costumes from different franchises were an idea they implemented when they were looking for something to add to amiibo, those costumes were going to be exclusive to the toy until few months before the release, but at the end they decided to have it unlocked because they though most fans would love them.
The exact opposite of what you said 
So amiibo was actually the reason why those costumes from other games exist even when they are not locked at the end. Worst thing of the generation.
|
And you believe them, lol. That's why we are in a terrible situation now. You will be defending them if the new content given for free in the remake of Super Mario 64 for DS was locked behind an amiibo.
pedromr said:
Yup. I think it's worse than DLC, it usually offers next to nothing if you consider the price tag. Ok, you get a figure, but still, it's a shitty way to sell me $5 worth of dlc packing it with $10 extra cost for the figure. They could let it go both ways: either pay $ 5 for the dlc, or pay $15 and get the toy and the dlc. |
I'm interested in the Ganondorf mode for TPHD but won't buy an overpriced feature because of a useless toy.
|
Why would I not believe them when it makes full sense? lol, you are the one who love to find any reason to hate about, it doesnt matter how wrong you are you are always trying to think about the worst intentions possible even when they barely make any sense.
The amiibo costums is so clearly based on amiibo, you dont have to be a genious to see where the motivations for that content comes from. But sure it was nothing related to amiibo lol.
