'Quantum Break' Is Financially Risky Because It's a AAA Game You Can Finish

[Nem]

Mr Puggsly said:

Nem said:
Oh here comes the propaganda again... you know whats risky? To make a bad game.

Instead of saying making, lets say releasing. Releasing bad games is a great way to ruin trust. Sega for example has obviously released numerous games knowing they were objectively bad. Fewer polished releases would have been more worthwhile then a lot of crap. For what its worth, crappy games hitting the market is less of an issue.

However, lets take into consideration good and great games fail as well. Games stuggling to make money isn't exclusive to bad games.

Definitly.

naruball said:

Nem said:

Talking about risk. To make a bad game is riskier than making a good one. I didnt say making a good game = rivers of money.

Then your statement is even worse. No one makes a game thinking it's going to be bad and is willing to take the risk. Definitely not when it comes to AAA games.

Alright, tell you what. If you have an appealing 3rd person shooter with just single player that is good, then there is little risk.

The stament they make is that games without multiplayer are a risk, and i profundly disagree with that premise. Its not about beeing a shooter aswell. Its simply about beeing a good and applealing game. Bethesda makes single player game and they are seeing tremendous sucess.