Pokemon Z still isn't out of the question, right?

[DivinePaladin]

mZuzek said:

DivinePaladin said:
There's no need in the modern era to make a third or even third/fourth version when they could just make the contents an add-on. The only thing a third version ever does is focus halfheartedly on the third mascot and add Battle Frontier. They can just make an overpriced $10 Battle Frontier DLC instead and mooch that way instead of putting extra time into a third version. Two was already excessive as it was, three was always a stretch to maintain long term; the fact that it took 20 years to retire the antiquated concept is almost sad.

Well, technically it took 15 years, but ok.

True, I didn't think to think about when Yellow released lol. Either way hopefully third games are dead. This is a series that I love but one that has not truly evolved substantially in 20 years and this is a step in the right direction. It's not something I actively realized until the past couple days for some reason, that every change brought forth is paltry by general gaming standards - but hey, baby steps.