By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BraLoD said:

You said it maybe could be planned that way and Sony override it, so it was clearly not Sony intention and had to be done prior to Sony coming and overriding, which was before they even had the money to actually do the game.

Anyway, you made it a bit more clear where you were coming from now, but it's still really not relevant or anything close to how it was always supposed to be in reality on how was it announced, you could say pretty much this kind of bad will stuff from anyone, I could say Nintendo was once planning to push DRM on WiiU but couldn't at launch so it was planning it to 2013 right before Microsoft got it a try and got the backslash, then they secretly flushed it away, does that sounds right to you? It just isn't, so do go blaming Capcom from something that was never supposed to be reality, that lives only in imagination realm and come out of nowhere, even more when reality depicts a very different events scenario, really, that's just not right.

Blame Capcom for things that actually happen.

Actually, I would no be surprised if Nintendo pondered the posibility at some point. The difference between your example and what I said is that Capcom has an history in the scumy dlc department. And because of that I don't think Capcom deserves my trust. Also, where's the fun in not doubting companies? I think the only thing I can trust about any company is their desire to maximize profits.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)