| twesterm said: Read the entire post. Gears = a game I know is good, a game I enjoyed, and adds more things that actually looks good. Haze = a game that feels only generic, tries to do what almost every other FPS has done, adds nothing that actually looks interesting. One of those two games is good and is alright to buy again until it actually becomes old (kind of like the single player in Halo 3), the other game is a copy of meh games that have been done a hundred times before. |
So you bought Gears of War despite it being a completely generic sci-fi shooter that has been done a hundred times before and added absolutely nothing new to the mix (Cover? Seen.)
But you won't buy Haze because of it being a completely generic sci-fi shooter that has been done a hundred times before and adds absolutely nothing new to the mix.
Sound logic.
For the record, I think Gears is one of the best games so far this generation, but it is still nothing more than a solid shooter from a reputable developer. I expect Haze to be the same.
