method114 on 24 February 2016
| mornelithe said: Part of the problem, I imagine, is that she already swore under oath that no rape had occurred. "Kesha once testified under oath that the alleged date rape at the center of her new lawsuit against Dr. Luke never took place — but her lawyer claims she was simply too scared to sing." http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/kesha-denied-date-rape-dr-luke-back-2011-article-1.1982546 Ultimately, the problem is evidence. She may have some, but none were produced during the hearing. However, they have her on record as denying the incident took place, under oath. Sworn testimony is given quite a bit of deference by the Court, and that gives the Judge virtually no options. I'm not saying it didn't happen, but, you can't really blame the Judge here. An allegation of something, does not mean guilt (no matter how much people think it's 'right' to suspend due process for allegations of sexual assault/rape) Sony also said that she could work with other management while her contract w/ her current manager is in effect. Not sure why that wouldn't work out for her while she figures out how to proceed with dumping her contract w/ her manager. |
Agreed there just isn't enough to really prove it happened. The bolded part is the most important part of your post. I'm positive it's the mindset of a lot of her fans and people angry with Sony. Anyone looking at this logically can certalinly understand why Sony wont release her.
