mornelithe on 22 February 2016
spemanig said:
No one on the internet knows what happened. The real report is that she originally said that she wasn't sexually assaulted, and then later said that she was and that the prior declaration was a lie because she was afraid to say something. |
True, however, the courts must award great deference to under oath testimony. It wasn't just that she said it, it was that she swore under oath during a secret deposition. This is literally the only proof that exists in the matter, and she expected the allegation to be enough for an injuction in court. Not sure what her lawyers were thinking, frankly. Oh wait, I know, they like money.
