CGI-Quality said:
Same difference. They released a game they wanted to make. Using the word "sold" vs "gave" is just arguing semantics. But even with that, nearly every developer releases what they want to release. What the consumer ends up liking/disliking is a gamble the dev always takes. |
Indeed but you stated that Until Dawn was resentful at the feedback they were getting.
|
CGI-Quality said: I think they were more resentful that people criticized them for making the game they wanted to make. Basically, they gave many people a game they wanted to make, but not necessarily what the people wanted to play. |
Why anyone would be resentful at feedback from the consumer is beyond me. I would think anyone making a game would want player feedback. If I made a game, I'd have people play it and then share their opinion on my game. I wouldn't be resentful, I'd be thankful.
I like to think the people over at UD are no different but seeing as how 1886 was already made, not releasing it due to negative feedback would only lose them money.
