| Nem said: Dragon age 2 wasnt badper se, but the fact that it was limited to basically one city made it feel alot less grandiose than DAO. In quisition though, is complete trash for me. Theres some nice missions but the main story is short, forces you into awful decisions if you are a fan of the series but worst of all, plays like a grindy repetitive open world game sliced in bites. Its super grinding and boring. It's nothing like the previous story driven games bioware makes. How to explain... its like playing an MMO offline. A bit like KoA: reckoning except the world areas are not interconnected. As for the tactics game. It's gonna be a mobile game, so best not. |
It's interesting what you said. I do believe that DA2 would have done much better had the name not been forcefully changed. Personally I think it would have been received differently.
That is really disappointing to hear about Inquisition. I'll try it out at some point. I heard that it was long but the grinding sounds boring. I'm rather sick of open world games these days so DA2 sounds the most impressive to me at the moment. Fans of Origins seem to hold distastes to the later titles. Auto-attack is very difficult for me to adjust to in games that aren't MMO's. Not as much these days as they used to.
I would rather hope that the Tactics game is a handheld title. NOT mobile, but for say the next Nintendo handheld. I think it would benefit being more Fire Emblem like. After all BioWare does have some experience with handhelds. ie Sonic.
