The Fury said:
This deal to me says Sony helping funding the game (yes even if it's SF and made by Capcom) and in return the game going on their console (considering PC release is also present), just like MS did with Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive. Other help might not have been as obvious, consultant programmers might have been sent to Capcom's development team to help with getting the game ready for PS4 (same might have been done for MS with the 2 games mentioned) yet we don't hear about that, why would we? Keep in mind also, SFV is cross platform between PC and PS4, they can play each other. Developers seem to have to make decisions on choosing 1 console over another if they are going to do that feature as it limits userbase as MS and Sony don't seem to like the idea that their userbases can play together. Examples, Rocket League on PS4 and Elite Dangerous on Xbox. None of the games mentioned above are anything like the TR debacle. |
Nothing you typed stopped people here, GAF, everywhere else from calling deals like Titanfall and SO moneyhats.
All i see is shifting goal posts to excuse SFV from the same criticism heaped onto Tomb Raider or Titanfall. Idk why, its not as if Sony is new to moneyhatting games or that theres anything wrong with it. But people seem to get offended if you point it out, even though no matter how far the goal posts are moved, you still just have a situation where Sony paid a company large amounts of money and in exchange that company kept their game off the console Sony is competing with this gen. Aka, a moneyhat. A rushed, buggy, chock full of F2P BS moneyhat. Capcom apparently didnt use much of that money Sony gave them to do actual work on the game.
User was warned for this post.
~Ultrashroomz
